 |
vwkombi writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 8:34:24 PM
What a great way to remember her, by removing all of her hard work that she lived to do.
|
|
|
 |
KirkLazerus writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 8:49:31 PM
that's what happens when people are bitches
|
|
|
 |
polardeficit writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 8:57:53 PM
our society is so pathetic and f*cked up im surprised we arent offended by ketchup since it could remind us of blood and the tragedy of death
|
|
|
 |
BlueMobius writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 9:08:40 PM
This is ridiculous! What a shame. Leave the movie in stores and let her work be recognized.
|
|
|
 |
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 9:35:06 PM
Um who was offended by the Heath Ledger scene again? Like seriously no one was, it was barely even a headline.
|
|
|
 |
rabid writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 9:55:34 PM
who cares?
it's not like anyone was going to rent that movie anyway.
|
|
|
|
rabid writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 9:56:46 PM
^that photo of her looks like Jerry Orbach^
|
|
|
 |
BondMcClane007 writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 10:07:25 PM
well lets see.. if Brittany Murphy was alive.. would sheee want the DVDs removed? One could only guess.. but an educated guess would be... no. But thats just a guess
|
|
|
 |
HOCK writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 10:12:26 PM
This is really stupid. It's not disrespectful, and Nolan knew that. It would be one thing if they changed the cover.
|
|
|
 |
synthetic1985 writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 11:04:09 PM
'Do you think stores are doing the right thing, or are they making it worse by not letting people watch one of Murphy's last films?'....allow me to answer that question with another question....would her family want to see this film since this picture only reminds them of where they found her dead?...because that's kind of creepy
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Ottley writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 11:07:12 PM
I got this on dvd, its an actual very bloody brilliant film, one of her best, i recommend getting it while its still on the shelves.
|
|
|
 |
Loki writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 11:24:24 PM
He was in a trash bag not a body bag. Ga! Media dousches!
|
|
|
 |
takai writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 11:36:20 PM
@polardeficit - I couldn't agree more.
|
|
|
|
synthetic1985 writes:
on December 24th, 2009 at 11:38:38 PM
how does the media still get away with making money off of any news they exaggerate?
|
|
|
 |
The Skippy Spartan writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 12:49:09 AM
No one was offended by that scene fromt eh Dark knight. And vWkombie, you make one great point!!
|
|
|
 |
FFantasy1984 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 1:08:29 AM
I think they should leave the ones that are in the store as they are. Maybe if there is a big cardboard photo of the cover take it down. But leave the current DVDs the same just reprint the new covers, if you think it could be offensive.
|
|
|
 |
Freudian_Nightmare writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 8:44:00 AM
That's some good irony. Always knew God had a sense of humour
|
|
|
 |
warlord writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 9:24:29 AM
thats OBAMA-CARE!
|
|
|
 |
BigUnit writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 9:42:07 AM
it sucks that your last few films were like low budg sci fi films....
|
|
|
 |
Cleveland Shaquisition writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 12:07:44 PM
Hey, Paul Newman is dead. Let's remove all of his movies in which his character dies. Come to think of it, Marlon Brando is dead too. He dies at the end of The Godfather doesn't he? Let's get rid of that one too. People are soo f*cking retarded.
|
|
|
 |
SpydrMonkeyakaSPF writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 12:41:11 PM
Taking away her DVD just because she has a picture or scene in it in which she dies or looks dead is pointless. We can't bring her back but we can remember her properly by watching her work. I mean it was only her career to be an actress.
|
|
|
 |
NatG83 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 12:57:34 PM
I think it was a good cover. It is, in my opinion, more disrespectful to censor the star's work (as vwkombi said).
|
|
|
 |
Jamall316 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 1:18:03 PM
Let remove everything that she ever did. People are such pussies. They should die so we can forget them.
|
|
|
 |
BigTate writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 1:25:20 PM
They're making it worse. Streisand Effect. That DK thing is also ridiculous. Just because somebody died doesn't mean their work has to be altered or hidden. It's the same thing with all of the WTC images removed from pictures and videos.
|
|
|
|
rabid writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 1:35:39 PM
Nah, it's probably just viral marketing to get people to pay attention to a movie they otherwise would not.
|
|
|
 |
thedudeman69 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 2:39:30 PM
HUR DUR WE ARE SO SORRY WE OFFENDED YOU WITH A DEAD BODY IN A BATHTUB!
It's a horror film for f*ck sake.
|
|
|
 |
Fixxer35 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 2:58:17 PM
Underneath the title of the film it should say "December 20th."
|
|
|
 |
THE MAD HATTER writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 5:14:14 PM
How said is that sh*t .I mean she was great but removing .Deadline from stores wont do a dame thing .
|
|
|
 |
ian_918 writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 7:30:07 PM
Movie sucked anyways.
|
|
|
|
Ronald Regan writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 9:57:14 PM
They didn't remove all the great things I did when I died....
|
|
|
|
havokx13x writes:
on December 25th, 2009 at 11:23:28 PM
I think this is ridiculous! I saw this movie. Sure it wasn't her best but her work should still be accessible so we can remember everything she did!
|
|
|
 |
darkraven28 writes:
on December 26th, 2009 at 11:31:44 AM
Society f*cks up again. Why are we even surprised?
|
|
|
|
FFantasy1984 writes:
on December 26th, 2009 at 2:36:45 PM
I think that they didn't do it because it could offend people. I think they may have done it more, because it could be hard for her family and friends to see that right now. Out of respect to them. I don't think they should pull the whole DVD but the cover needing to be changed I can see that.I could see how it could be hard for someone you cared about to die and then see something like that. Imagine how you might feel. A few years from now maybe not so hard but right now I think it would be. Changing the cover would seem like something people would be okay with, not pulling the whole DVD. It's like when they removed the scene in Spiderman with the twin towers, it was out of respect.
|
|
|
|
warlord writes:
on December 27th, 2009 at 2:21:28 PM
what what! thare pulling her dvds?? but they could not get eniff of michael jacksons crap out so a good actoress gets her movies pulld and a pedafile get more of his crap put out on the street thats f*ckd up!
|
|
|
 |
StrongR3tard writes:
on December 27th, 2009 at 3:36:37 PM
you said it warlord. lets honour her memory by trying to get people to forget her work
|
|
|
 |
Goober3000 writes:
on December 27th, 2009 at 5:45:03 PM
bummer....
|
|
|
 |
carl4prez writes:
on December 27th, 2009 at 7:51:48 PM
Can you say overracting? Why not leave the hard work shes done be and for those whining about political correctness can go to hell. I mean, (not that these to films should be compared) how would the dark knight been if they removed the body bag scene? People just need to shut up.
|
|
|
 |
n/a writes:
on December 28th, 2009 at 8:41:35 AM
its crazy cuz didnt she die in the bath....
|
|
|
 |
Long Rod VonHugendong writes:
on December 28th, 2009 at 5:15:20 PM
Well People are a bunch of crybaby f*cks, OMG she dies so a MOVIE she acted in shows her dead OH MY GOD lets take it off the shelf, Its a Movie for Christ sake, this is what she loved to do, Act, so taking the movie down is offending her
|
|
|
 |
Dre-EL writes:
on December 29th, 2009 at 10:17:04 AM
Removing her work material simply cause she died is a gross over reaction.
nuff said.
|
|
|
 |
dAnKoNe23 writes:
on December 29th, 2009 at 3:58:21 PM
Wow, who makes these stupid f*cking decisions!!!???...RIDICULOUS.
|
|
|
 |
JKline writes:
on January 25th, 2010 at 8:52:08 PM
art imitates life... I do not think it is disrespectful to let the movie remain
|
|
|
|
