Full International Trailer for "Django Unchained"

I'm actually in to this.

I swear, this entire film is basically based of some ancient mythology. Unfortunately, I can't recall which, not that I care, as Tarantino is probably the most over-rated director to have ever lived.

Michael bay and judd Apatow are Overrated to me

Yeah, but we're talking about directors bando, not male whores.

Mink, what movies DO you like? Nothing ever seems to "SUIT" you.

True,oliver stone was a bit Overrated couple years back

^anything made back when Hollywood gave a f*ck, had a soul and heart and appreciated talent over some d*ckless *ssholes ability to deceive audiences into shoveling out their money.

Any more questions, kid?

Tarantino gave me faith again after inglorious basterds and he wrote another Good role for brad pitt.so yea he's like the god of all the indie filmakers.

70's, 80's, and 90's flicks, then?

There's still SOME people who give a sh*t.
Ridley Scott (sure, PROMETHEUS was sh*t but at least it was f*cking original.), Martin Scorsese (HUGO and sh*tTER Island was sh*t, but they wore original too), and most of all Quentin Tarantino! (His movies might be regurgitated 70's sh*t, but he doesn't do it for money.)

Shaymalan gives original sh*ts all the time

Back in my day,you had to 'put out' to get a part

goodtimz

Adios SNITCH!!

And spare me the 'save my family' bullsh*t. He knew exactly what he was getting into from the start. He found the loophole to get away with it and live free.

wrong thread obviously

Mink
If you hate all these movies, why do you spend so much time on here?

Tom...once again sporting a beard, once again shot in the chest. Will that man never get a break?

Mink,

Maybe you should switch to television.

i enjoy sh*t and i definately want to see this sh*t.

I agree with mink about tarantino...very overrated...and this trailer is not impressive at all...weak casting of jamie foxx and dicaprio...

@W0WCraft1 - actually i think the problem with Tarantino is that he DOES do it for the money. He made his bones with Reservoir Dogs and then had a critical and box office hit with Pulp Fiction. He was the toast of the town after that and it was nearly 20 years ago. He should by now be making films that are extraordinary and challenging but desperately tries to recapture that adulation. He hasn't progressed as a film maker and it is sad. I was a fan but only rate his first three films.

He considers Paul Thomas Anderson as a contemporary/rival/com-rad but does not see that PTA is evolving as a director, sure you're aloud the odd misstep, but that's the price you pay when you're taking risks.

Tarantino plays it safe. He's better than the sh*t he makes. He does it because it is easy and because he is an adulation whore.

@Mink - i agree about cinema today being uninspired.

I think the reason we keep coming here and keep watching is looking for those films that seem personal, made by someone who does give a sh*t.

"Keep feeding them sh*t, pretty soon they're gonna crave sh*t."

Correction: Joseph gordon-levitt dropped off this project

Anyone see Possible Worlds? Doubtful. Pretty good film with Tilda Swinton, although her face makes me cry. Better than most trash I see nowadays. Ending was something of a letdown. Anyway, if you haven't, and you like FILM, give it a try. If not, go watch Transformers.

Just the speech about imagination in Possible Worlds has me intrigued

Seems like its along the same lines as 'Primer'which was also recommended to me here,so thx MINK
Its goin on my to do list

Mink, I think I finaly understand you. You got the granddad syndrome.
The granddad syndrome is the decease every old man gets sooner or later. The symptoms are very easy to spot.

The first one is Cynicism
You wrote: " Yeah, but we're talking about directors bando, not male whores"
-Check-

Memory loss
You wrote:"I swear, this entire film is basically based of some ancient mythology. Unfortunately, I can't recall which"
-check-

And finaly, the last symptom is when you get the notion that everything was better when you were young.

You wrote "anything made back when Hollywood gave a f*ck, had a soul and heart and appreciated talent over some d*ckless *ssholes ability to deceive audiences into shoveling out their money"
-ehh check-

How many grandkids do you have?

Yeah, except I'm not a 'grandpa', and neither am I nowhere as near as old as you think, and even worse for your theory, I still very much enjoy sh*t that's younger than me, like certain music and games, and even moreso, technology.

Having said that, you need to face the possibility that movies are just sh*t now, mostly, and Hollywood has long since passed their prime, which was about 1993 or so, and deal with the fact film is now so heavily commercialized that whatever once made it an enjoyable art medium is now dead.

Occam's razor, buddy.

"How many grandkids do you have?"

ZERO. But like many before you, I'll give you an e for effort.

And yes, Pornfly, good movie imo, and certainly NOT an oldie but goodie from Mink's golden years, contrary to the opinion of WP's latest theorizer of my motivations and personality idiosyncrasies.

LMAO, Just checked. I'm younger than you dude!

*GREAT* theory, swoooop!

I didnt say your old, I claimed you acted old. Big difference. But anyhuuu, I agree with you. Hollywood is empty, dry, whased out. Im not shure hart and soul is their biggest problem tho. Orginality is Hollywoods biggest problem nowadays inn my opinion. When they recyckle every brand and SUCKsessfull movie ever made, porly, hart and soul is not to be expected.
When Hollywood some days get their balls back, and they start putting their money on some new and fresh sh*tt, I think heart and soul will come back naturally. But I wount be expecting this anythime soon. So I spend my money on what you americans call forein sh*tt, and I download the crap from Hollywood, just to keep track of what their doing.

(sorry about all the type Os. I slept truh english inn class decades ago)

I approve. waltz gets buck